Intel Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

               year which shall be deemed to have been paid or accrued                
               in such preceding or subsequent taxable year * * *                     
               Petitioner argues that section 904(c) is a clear legislative           
          expression that interest is not imposed on tax liability "paid"             
          by foreign tax carrybacks, because such carrybacks are "deemed              
          taxes paid or accrued to foreign countries * * * in" (emphasis              
          added) the year to which they are carried back and no statutory             
          provision exists that contradicts this plain language.                      
          Petitioner describes the various interest provisions in the                 
          Internal Revenue Code as detailed and complex and points to the             
          absence of a specific interest provision concerning foreign tax             
          carrybacks in situations involving deficiencies as significant in           
          light of other provisions dealing with the question of interest             
          on deficiencies involving other types of carrybacks.  Respondent            
          urges us to preserve symmetry between the treatment of interest             
          on deficiencies with that of interest on overpayments in the                
          foreign tax carryback situation, in keeping with Manning v.                 
          Seeley Tube & Box Co., supra; United States v. Koppers Co., 348             
          U.S. 254 (1955), and the recently decided Fluor Corp. &                     
          Affiliates v. United States, 126 F.3d 1397 (Fed. Cir. 1997).                
               We begin our analysis of the scope of the language of                  
          section 904(c) mindful of our observations in Hospital Corp. of             
          Am. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. 73, 84-85 (1996):                             
               The language of a statute * * * cannot be viewed in                    
               isolation.  In construing the meaning of [a] section                   
               * * *, it is necessary to consider all of the words of                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011