Steven and Jennie Jacobs - Page 15

                                                 - 15 -                                                   

                  Petitioner testified that the $15,300 claimed as a deduction                            
            for printing expenses was based upon the following costs of                                   
            producing the brochures and folios for the real estate brokers:                               
             Petitioners’      Creative        Production          Total                                  
            Exhibit           Fees             Costs             Cost                                     
            5                  $1,500                   $4,184.77         $5,684.77                       
            6                        500                2,201.07          2,701.07                        
            7                        500                3,427.10          3,927.10                        
            8                        500                3,427.10          3,927.10                        
            9                   500                      2,201.07              2,701.07                   
            Exhibit totals     3,500          15,441.11        18,941.11                                  
            Examples of the brochures and folios, with an attached statement                              
            of the production cost of each, were introduced into evidence.                                
            Attached to Exhibit 5 was an invoice to the client for                                        
            photography and printing costs reciting that a partial payment                                
            had already been received.                                                                    
                  Petitioner has not persuaded us that he included in his                                 
            gross income any amounts corresponding to the $15,300 or more he                              
            allegedly paid to printers and photographers.  He claimed to have                             
            the evidence but failed to provide it to the Court.  We are                                   
            satisfied that the payments were made directly by the clients to                              
            the printers or that, if petitioner acted as a conduit for the                                
            payments, he did not include them in gross income.  In either                                 
            case, he is not entitled to a deduction for them.  It defies                                  
            credibility that petitioner would enter arrangements that would                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011