Lester Johnson and Sherelle D. Brooks-Johnson - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          deficiency in income tax of $55,628 and a section 6662(a) penalty           
          of $11,126.  This notice was sent to P.O. Box 4098, Diamond Bar,            
          CA 91765-0098 (the Diamond Bar address).                                    
               A letter from “L. Johnson” with a copy of the 1993 notice of           
          deficiency attached thereto, requesting rules for filing a                  
          petition and a petition form, was received by the Court on May              
          12, 1997, and filed as a petition.  The Court ordered petitioners           
          to file a proper amended petition on or before July 15, 1997, and           
          to pay the $60 filing fee.  The amended petition was timely filed           
          and sought to place in dispute 1994 as well as 1993.3                       
               The amended petition contained the following statements                
          regarding the 1994 notice of deficiency:                                    
               “Never received the ‘notice of deficiency’ for 1994.  We               
               were told about it on November 13, 1996 that we had until              
               12/2/96"                                                               
               “We never received the ‘statutory notice of deficiency.’  we           
               were told via the attached letter dated November 6, 1996               
               that we had 3 weeks to file with the Tax Court.  Please note           
               that notices were sent to an address where we had not lived            
               in almost 3 years!!”                                                   
          A letter attached to the amended petition was addressed to Lester           
          Johnson at the Scenic Ridge address, and stated that it was in              
          response to “your recent inquiry regarding the Statutory Notice             
          of Deficiency which was issued on 9/3/96."  That letter further             

          3  Inasmuch as the original petition was filed more than 90                 
          days after the mailing of the 1994 notice of deficiency, we need            
          not consider whether the original petition sought, as did the               
          amended petition, to place in dispute 1994 as well as 1993.  Cf.            
          O’Neil v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 105, 107-108 (1976).                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011