Michael H. Johnson and Patricia E. Johnson - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         

          II. Fraud/Negligence                                                        
               Section 6663(a) imposes a penalty equal to 75 percent of the           
          portion of the underpayment attributable to fraud.  Section                 
          6662(a) imposes a accuracy-related penalty equal to 20 percent of           
          the portion of the underpayment attributable to negligence or a             
          substantial understatement.  See sec. 6662(b)(1) and (2).                   
               For purposes of the fraud and accuracy-related penalties, an           
          "underpayment" is the amount by which any tax imposed by the Code           
          exceeds the excess of the sum of the amount shown as the tax by             
          the taxpayer on his return plus amounts not so shown previously             
          assessed (or collected without assessment) over the amount of               
          rebates made.  Sec. 6664(a).  In this case, the adjustments                 
          respondent made in the statutory notice of deficiency stem from             
          the determination that petitioners are not entitled to defer                
          recognition of gain on their disposition of the 23d Street                  
          property pursuant to section 1033.  We have found that                      
          petitioners are entitled to section 1033 deferral of gain;                  
          therefore, there is no "underpayment", and petitioners are not              
          liable for penalties pursuant to section 6663(a) or section                 
          6662(a).                                                                    
          III.  Failure to File                                                       
               The section 6651(a)(1) addition to tax for 1992 was based on           
          the deficiency determined by respondent.  As a result of our                
          holding that petitioners are entitled to defer recognition of               





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011