Irene E. Jones, a.k.a. Irene E. Perry-Jones a.k.a. Irene E. Perry - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         

                                     Discussion                                       
          1.  Dependency Exemptions                                                   
               Section 151(c) allows a taxpayer, subject to certain                   
          requirements, a deduction for a personal exemption for each of              
          the taxpayer's dependents as defined in section 152.  A daughter            
          or a granddaughter of a taxpayer over half of whose support, for            
          the calendar year in which the taxable year of the taxpayer                 
          begins, is provided by the taxpayer qualifies as a dependent.               
          Sec. 152(a)(1).                                                             
               Section 1.152-1(a)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs., provides that in           
          determining whether an individual received over half of his or              
          her support from the taxpayer, "there shall be taken into account           
          the amount of support received from the taxpayer as compared to             
          the entire amount of support which the individual received from             
          all sources, including support which the individual himself                 
          supplied."  In Blanco v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 512, 514-515                 
          (1971), this Court held that, in establishing that more than one-           
          half of a dependent's support has been provided, a prerequisite             
          to such a showing is the demonstration by competent evidence of             
          the total amount of the dependent's support from all sources for            
          that year.  If the amount of total support is not established and           
          cannot be reasonably inferred from competent evidence available             
          to the Court, it is not possible to conclude that the taxpayer              







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011