Fatai and Mary King - Page 2

                                          2                                           
          to their Schedule C business income.  Petitioners have the burden           
          of proving that such adjustments are erroneous.  Welch v.                   
          Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  All section references are            
          to Internal Revenue Code in effect for 1992, and all Rule                   
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            
          During 1992, petitioners owned and operated three newsstands.  On           
          Schedule C of their 1992 Federal income tax return, petitioners             
          reported cost of goods sold of $403,350 and gross receipts of               
          $445,000.  During the audit, petitioners attempted to                       
          substantiate these items with altered and incomplete records.               
          Because the records were patently unreliable, respondent used a             
          combination of methods (i.e., percentage markup, unit and volume,           
          and specific items methods of proof) to reconstruct petitioners'            
          income.  We conclude that respondent's methods were reasonable.             
               On Schedule C of their return, petitioners reported $40,250            
          of expenses, of which respondent disallowed the following:                  
          $3,500 in bad debts, $8,500 for repairs and maintenance, $3,600             
          for meals and entertainment, $9,000 for utilities, and $8,500 for           
          wages.  With respect to wages, petitioners established that they            
          paid $180 per week for 40 weeks in 1992.  Therefore, they are               
          entitled to a deduction of $7,200.  Petitioners failed to offer             
          any evidence that supports, or any reasonable evidentiary basis             
          for the Court to estimate, any of the remaining expenses.                   
               Respondent determined an accuracy-related penalty pursuant             
          to section 6662.  The accuracy-related penalty applies to any               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011