- 5 - 7206(1) relating to the years 1988, 1989, and 1990.3 On August 25, 1995, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, on the basis of petitioner's guilty plea, held petitioner guilty of one count of violating section 7206(1). Invoices from the Bullfrog's vendors (vendor invoices), when compared to purchases reported on petitioner's returns (reported purchases), demonstrate that petitioner failed to report purchases of $39,228, $42,787.80, $48,060.90, and $13,620.32 for 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990, respectively (unreported purchases). Reported purchases were paid for by checks drawn on the Bullfrog's account at Marine Midland Bank, and unreported purchases were paid for by cash drawn from the cash register.4 Petitioner kept no record of his unreported purchases, and he failed to advise his return preparer, Michael Dillon (Mr. Dillon), of the unreported purchases.5 Petitioner failed to report the gross receipts generated by the sale of the unreported 3 The plea agreement, dated May 15, 1995, stated the following factual basis for petitioner's plea of guilty: The defendant failed to report substantial cash purchases of beer, liquor, and wine on his federal income tax returns for the 1988, 1989, and 1990 tax years. The defendant knew the amounts stated on his tax returns as expenses were not accurate. The defendant signed the aforementioned federal income tax returns under penalty of perjury, knowing the returns falsely stated the amount of expenditures for beer, liquor, and wine. 4 Petitioner ordered and paid for all of the inventory purchased for the Bullfrog. 5 The parties agree, however, that petitioner's reported purchases are not in dispute.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011