Theodore Langworthy, Jr. - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          7206(1) relating to the years 1988, 1989, and 1990.3  On August             
          25, 1995, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New           
          York, on the basis of petitioner's guilty plea, held petitioner             
          guilty of one count of violating section 7206(1).                           
               Invoices from the Bullfrog's vendors (vendor invoices), when           
          compared to purchases reported on petitioner's returns (reported            
          purchases), demonstrate that petitioner failed to report                    
          purchases of $39,228, $42,787.80, $48,060.90, and $13,620.32 for            
          1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990, respectively (unreported purchases).            
          Reported purchases were paid for by checks drawn on the                     
          Bullfrog's account at Marine Midland Bank, and unreported                   
          purchases were paid for by cash drawn from the cash register.4              
          Petitioner kept no record of his unreported purchases, and he               
          failed to advise his return preparer, Michael Dillon (Mr.                   
          Dillon), of the unreported purchases.5  Petitioner failed to                
          report the gross receipts generated by the sale of the unreported           

          3    The plea agreement, dated May 15, 1995, stated the following           
          factual basis for petitioner's plea of guilty:                              
               The defendant failed to report substantial cash                        
               purchases of beer, liquor, and wine on his federal                     
               income tax returns for the 1988, 1989, and 1990 tax                    
               years.  The defendant knew the amounts stated on his                   
               tax returns as expenses were not accurate.  The                        
               defendant signed the aforementioned federal income tax                 
               returns under penalty of perjury, knowing the returns                  
               falsely stated the amount of expenditures for beer,                    
               liquor, and wine.                                                      
          4    Petitioner ordered and paid for all of the inventory                   
          purchased for the Bullfrog.                                                 
          5    The parties agree, however, that petitioner's reported                 
          purchases are not in dispute.                                               


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011