- 3 - which NOL's do not relate to the Arbitrage Management adjustments. The stipulation does not provide that petitioners would be allowed any NOL deductions carried back from later years unrelated to the Arbitrage Management adjustments. With regard to increased interest under section 6621(c), the stipulation also states that such interest shall apply to adjustments relating to the “purchase and sale of U.S. Treasury bills and options for the 1979 tax year” (i.e., to the adjustments relating to Arbitrage Management). Contrary to petitioners’ contention, the stipulation does not provide for such increased interest to be applied to only 50 percent of the 1979 income tax deficiency relating to the Arbitrage Management adjustments. Generally, taxpayers and respondent are held to their written stipulations regarding the manner by which disputed tax adjustments are to be settled. Stamm Intl. Corp. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 315, 320-322 (1988). Petitioners have not established any justifiable basis for being relieved from the stipulation regarding the adjustments relating to Arbitrage Management. Further, new issues generally are not to be raised in the process of making Rule 155 computations. Harris v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 121, 124 (1992), affd. 16 F.3d 75 (5th Cir. 1994). Clearly, in the context of the instant Rule 155 computations, thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011