- 7 - petitioners failed to discuss this issue either at trial or on brief, and offered no evidence with respect to this issue. Accordingly, we sustain respondent's determination with respect to the disallowed Schedule C deductions. Medical Expenses On their 1994 joint Federal income tax return, petitioners claimed itemized deductions of $11,976 for medical and dental expenses. Respondent made no adjustment to this amount in the notice of deficiency. At trial, petitioners claimed they were entitled to additional medical expenses in the amount of $6,490 for hearing aids. Petitioners failed to raise this issue in either their original or amended petitions. Furthermore, petitioners have never requested leave to amend their pleadings. Petitioners had ample time to file such a motion, and although petitioners are pro se litigants, they are familiar with this Court's rules and procedures. For example, on April 2, 1998, just 11 days before trial, petitioners filed a motion for leave to file a second amended petition in order to raise additional arguments. The Court granted that motion on April 7, 1998. Petitioners did not raise the issue of increased medical deductions in that motion, but waited until the trial. The purpose of the pleadings is to give the parties and the Court fair notice of the matters in controversy and the basis forPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011