Estate of Martin J. Machat, Deceased, Avril Giacobbi and Eric R. Sklar, Executors - Page 19

                                                - 19 -                                                  

            45 B.T.A. 1073 (1941).  Moreover, we think that the estate's                                
            position results in an impermissible deferral of tax on the                                 
            distributions.  Under the estate's approach, so long as the                                 
            temporary administrator held the distributions, there was no tax                            
            to pay on the principal, neither by the estate nor by anyone                                
            else.  But these funds, upon receipt by him, were immediately                               
            available to satisfy the estate's debts and expenses.  No                                   
            restriction was placed on the estate's use and enjoyment of these                           
            funds that would warrant a postponement of the tax.  Cf. Grimm v.                           
            Commissioner, 894 F.2d 1165, 1169 (10th Cir. 1990), affg. 89 T.C.                           
            747 (1987).7  We therefore find that, for Federal tax purposes,                             
            substantial restrictions and/or limitations were not placed on                              
            the use of the distributed funds.                                                           
                  For the aforementioned reasons, we sustain respondent's                               
            determination and hold that the 1988 and 1989 fund transfers from                           
            the Plan and Trust to the temporary administrator were includable                           



                  7  We also note that the estate's failure to report the                               
            distributions as income in the years of receipt by the temporary                            
            administrator is inconsistent with its treatment of income                                  
            generated from the distributions and its report of a substantial                            
            portion of the distributions as income in the years the funds                               
            were used to satisfy the estate's liabilities.  In 1988 and 1989,                           
            the estate filed tax returns reporting interest income derived                              
            from the pension funds.  In 1990 and 1991, the estate reported                              
            the funds themselves as income to the extent that they were used                            
            to pay the estate's expenses.  Consistency, however misplaced,                              
            dictates that the estate would not report any of the                                        
            distributions or income derived thereon as income until there was                           
            a subsequent distribution to the ultimate beneficiary.                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011