- 5 - examining petitioners’ income tax returns was assigned to Dallas IRS Examination Group 1432 on February 16, 1995. There remained 16� months before the limitations period for 1991 would expire. In mid-December 1995, a revenue agent in Dallas saw the administrative files for petitioners’ case, together with those for 16 other cases, in the bottom of an extra file cabinet outside the acting manager’s office. There remained 6� months before the limitations period for 1991 would expire. Finally, on April 17, 1996, petitioners’ case was assigned by the acting manager to a revenue agent, Julie Ward, hereinafter sometimes referred to as Ward. Ward’s manager instructed her to secure extensions of the limitations periods and, if she could not do so, then she was to “write-up and disallow issues and send to 90-Day.” There remained 10� weeks before the limitations period for 1991 would expire. The April 23, 1996, Meeting On April 18, 1996, Ward telephoned petitioners’ representative, and left a message in order to set up a meeting. She called again on April 19. Petitioners’ representative returned the April 19 telephone call, but Ward was not available. Ward left another message for petitioners’ representative that afternoon. Ward finally reached petitioners’ representative by telephone on April 22, and asked for extensions of the limitations periods. Petitioners’ representative expressedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011