Robert M. and Paulette G. Maddox - Page 22

                                                - 22 -                                                  
            start that he had in his possession “all of the books, records,                             
            and source documents that will be necessary to complete a 1991                              
            and 1992 examination.”  However, as of November 21, 1996,                                   
            petitioners’ representative had not shown any of this                                       
            documentation to respondent.                                                                
                  Both sides agree that respondent’s position is to be                                  
            evaluated in the context of what led to the formulation of that                             
            position.  See Lennox v. Commissioner, 998 F.2d 244, 247-248 (5th                           
            Cir. 1993), revg. T.C. Memo. 1992-382; Powers v. Commissioner,                              
            100 T.C. 457, 473-474 (1993), affd. in part and revd. in part on                            
            other issues 43 F.3d 172 (5th Cir. 1995); see also Coastal                                  
            Petroleum Refiners v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. at 687; Golsen v.                               
            Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970), affd. 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir.                             
            1971).                                                                                      
                  In analyzing the situation on November 21, 1996, both sides                           
            focus on the events preceding the issuance of the notice of                                 
            deficiency.  It may be helpful to briefly summarize the events.                             
            In October 1994, about 2 years after petitioners filed their 1991                           
            tax return and about 1 year after petitioners filed their 1992                              
            tax return, respondent notified petitioners that both tax returns                           
            would be examined.  The next month, petitioners’ representative                             
            asked respondent to change the place of audit from El Paso to                               
            Dallas.  Respondent thereupon asked petitioners to extend the                               
            1991 tax return period of limitations to June 30, 1996.                                     
            Petitioners did so in late December 1994, respondent signed the                             
            extension on January 5, 1995, and respondent thereupon                                      




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011