Gregory Stewart Malone and Pamela Joyce Malone - Page 12

                                                - 12 -                                                  

            Section 6673 Penalty                                                                        
                  We turn now to that part of respondent's motion that moves                            
            for an award of a penalty against petitioners under section                                 
            6673(a).  Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Tax Court to require                            
            a taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty not in excess of                           
            $25,000 whenever it appears that proceedings have been instituted                           
            or maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay or that the                               
            taxpayer's position in such proceedings is frivolous or                                     
            groundless.                                                                                 
                  A petition to the Tax Court is frivolous "if it is contrary                           
            to established law and unsupported by a reasoned, colorable                                 
            argument for change in the law."  Coleman v. Commissioner, 791                              
            F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir. 1986), affg. an unreported order of this                              
            Court.  Based on well-established law, petitioners' positions are                           
            frivolous and groundless.                                                                   
                  The record in this case convinces us that petitioners were                            
            not interested in disputing the merits of either the deficiencies                           
            in income tax or the additions to tax determined by respondent in                           
            the respective notices of deficiency.  Rather, the record                                   
            demonstrates that petitioners regard this case as a vehicle to                              
            espouse their own misguided views of the tax laws of this                                   
            country.                                                                                    








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011