Charles E. Marquart, III - Page 12

                                                - 12 -                                                  

                  In the final analysis, petitioner has simply tried to                                 
            portray a straightforward police operation as a conspiracy to                               
            subvert his privacy rights.  We are not persuaded by any of the                             
            arguments petitioner makes to support his theory that such a                                
            conspiracy existed.  Accordingly, petitioner's motion in limine                             
            will be denied.                                                                             
                                                             An appropriate order will                  
                                                       be issued, and decision will                     
                                                       be entered for respondent                        
                                                       reflecting the revised amounts                   
                                                       to which the parties have                        
                                                       agreed.                                          

























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  

Last modified: May 25, 2011