Lucila Novoa - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         

          turning over to her mother the bulk of the proceeds from cashing            
          her pay checks.  Petitioner submitted a Form W-2 reflecting 1993            
          wages paid by Drug Festival, Inc., to Jennifer in the gross                 
          amount of $6,330.  After Federal, State, and payroll taxes were             
          withheld, Jennifer's net wages amounted to $5,078.  Subtracting             
          $250, approximately the amount she kept for herself during the              
          year, we find that Jennifer gave petitioner $4,828 in 1993.                 
               Finally, petitioner testified that in January 1993, her                
          friend Vilma Reye lent her $500 in order to help her pay her                
          bills, and that in April 1993, petitioner repaid the $500 loan.             
               We find the testimony of petitioner and her daughter to be             
          credible with respect to these items.  We therefore find that               
          petitioner has carried her burden of proving that the foregoing             
          amounts were received from nontaxable sources and were                      
          erroneously included in respondent's determination, thereby                 
          overstating petitioner's unreported income by $8,199.  We                   
          therefore sustain respondent's revised determination of                     
          unreported income only to the extent of $17,449.                            
          B. Rental Expenses Reported on Schedule E                                   
               Respondent's determination added $6,166 to petitioner's rent           
          income.  The adjustment consisted of a $2,800 computational error           
          relating to the way petitioner allocated her Schedule E expenses            
          to the rental portion of the two-family residence.  Petitioner              
          has conceded the computational error portion of the adjustment.             





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011