- 14 - E. License Use Petitioners assert that $39,163 of their unexplained deposits for 1992 is attributable to salesmen's use of Mr. Ortiz' license to purchase automobiles. They argue that only money attributable to the $100 fees that Mr. Ortiz charged the salesmen for each car purchased using this license should be taxed. However, petitioners failed to substantiate any of these salesmen's purchases and provided no information indicating how many $100 fees they received. Petitioners also failed to show that money received from any such transactions was deposited into either of the bank accounts. F. Conclusions as to Unreported Income In sum, we hold that Mr. Ortiz had unreported self- employment income from his wholesale used car business of $17,390 in 1991 and $49,163 in 1992. Petitioners had unreported interest income of $18,000 in 1991 and $4,000 in 1992. Issue 2. Additional Interest Income We hold that petitioners did not receive additional interest income of $3,500 in 1991 and $3,000 in 1992. These amounts are included in the interest payments petitioners have conceded they received from Mr. Rodriguez. See supra Issue 1D. Issue 3. Capital Loss for 1991 Under section 1211 a taxpayer other than a corporation is limited to $3,000 in net capital losses in any given tax year.Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011