Richard L. Pickering - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          of deficiency to the taxpayer at the taxpayer's "last known                 
          address".  Sec. 6212(b); Frieling v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 42, 52           
          (1983).  If a notice of deficiency is mailed to the taxpayer at             
          the taxpayer's last known address, actual receipt of the notice             
          by the taxpayer is immaterial.  King v. Commissioner, 857 F.2d              
          676, 679 (9th Cir. 1988), affg. 88 T.C. 1042 (1987); Yusko v.               
          Commissioner, 89 T.C. 806, 810 (1987); Frieling v. Commissioner,            
          supra at 52.  The taxpayer, in turn, generally has 90 days from             
          the date that the notice of deficiency is mailed to file a                  
          petition in this Court for a redetermination of the deficiency.             
          Sec. 6213(a).                                                               
          It is evident from the undisputed facts in this case that                   
          the Court lacks jurisdiction.  In particular, there is no dispute           
          that the petition was not filed within the 90-day period                    
          prescribed by section 6213(a).  However, in view of the fact that           
          respondent used an incorrect ZIP code in mailing the notice of              
          deficiency, the issue that remains concerns the validity of the             
          notice.  If we were to conclude that the notice of deficiency is            
          invalid, then we would dismiss this case on that basis, rather              
          than for lack of a timely filed petition.  See Keeton v.                    
          Commissioner, 74 T.C. 377, 379-380 (1980).                                  
               The Court has long held that an inconsequential error in the           
          address used in mailing a notice of deficiency does not render              
          the notice invalid.  See Frieling v. Commissioner, supra                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011