- 8 - a duty to independently research foreign law. See Twohy v. First Natl. Bank, 758 F.2d 1185, 1193 (7th Cir. 1985) (construing rule 44.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). In MacLean v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 1045, 1053 (1980), this Court refused to hold that a taxpayer who offered no evidence of United Kingdom law was a United Kingdom resident for tax purposes. In the instant case, petitioners did not introduce or cite any Canadian law on the issue of residency either at trial or in their briefs. Even in the instant motion for reconsideration, petitioners failed to cite a single Canadian statute, regulation, or case which would be relevant precedent on the issue of residency for Canadian tax purposes. In their reply brief and in the instant motion, petitioners cite only Interpretation Bulletin IT-221R2 issued by Revenue Canada. That bulletin represents the position of Revenue Canada, the Canadian tax administrator, and "does not have the binding effect of law". Mattabi Mines Ltd. v. Minister of Revenue (Ontario) (1988) 53 D.L.R. (4th) 656, 664. Because petitioners failed to present this Court with any reference to authoritative Canadian law, it was not substantial error for this Court to find that petitioner was not a Canadian resident under Canadian law and therefore refuse to apply the Canada Convention in the instant case. For that reason, we deny petitioners' motion for reconsideration. Moreover, even if we were to accept petitioners' contention that petitioner was a Canadian resident under Canadian law andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011