Steve D. Putnam - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

          Commissioner, 79 T.C. 1, 7 (1982); Kennelly v. Commissioner, 56             
          T.C. 936, 943 (1971), affd. without published opinion 456 F.2d              
          1335 (2d Cir. 1972).  Furthermore, the mere failure of an                   
          employee to seek reimbursement cannot convert the employer’s                
          expenses into the employee’s.  Kennelly v. Commissioner, supra.             
          The employee has the burden of establishing that the employer               
          would not reimburse the expense had the employee requested                  
          reimbursement.  Podems v. Commissioner, 24 T.C. 21, 23 (1955).              
          Moreover, the prohibition of deductions for reimbursable expenses           
          is a “bright line rule” and applies even when the employee is               
          unaware that the expenses are reimbursable.  Orvis v.                       
          Commissioner, supra.                                                        
               During 1993, TI had a policy of reimbursing meals and                  
          entertainment, travel, computer, and gift expenses incurred in              
          pursuit of company business.  Petitioner never sought                       
          reimbursement for the claimed expenses in 1993, and he has not              
          shown that reimbursement would have been denied for those                   
          expenses that constituted ordinary and necessary business                   
          expenditures.                                                               
               Petitioner testified that similar expenses had been turned             
          down before 1993 by his boss, Mr. Fullerton.  Petitioner did not            
          call Mr. Fullerton or another representative from TI to testify             
          in support of his claim, which raises the presumption that the              
          testimony would not have been favorable to petitioner.  Wichita             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011