Estate of Robert W. Quick, Deceased, Esther P. Quick, Personal Representative, and Esther P. Quick - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          1990-53.  The burden of proof as to new matters and increased               
          deficiencies pleaded in the amended answer will be upon                     
          respondent.  Rule 142(a).                                                   
               B.  Petitioners' Motion for Leave To File Amendment to                 
               Petition                                                               
               Petitioners seek leave to amend their petition to allege in            
          greater detail the facts necessary to establish the amount of net           
          operating losses that they contend may be carried back to 1987              
          and 1988, as well as the amount of refunds due them for those               
          years stemming from what they contend are the "proper"                      
          computational adjustments for 1989 and 1990.  Petitioners further           
          seek to amend their petition to allege that respondent's                    
          application of the higher interest rate imposed on tax motivated            
          transactions pursuant to section 6621(c) to the assessments for             
          1987 and 1988 is in error.                                                  
               Respondent has stated in writing that, if the Court were to            
          grant respondent's motion to amend the answer, respondent would             
          withdraw any objection to petitioners' motion to amend the                  
          petition.  Accordingly, we will grant petitioners' motion.  Rule            
          41(a).                                                                      
          II.  Petitioners' Motion for Summary Judgment                               
               Among other things, in their motion for summary judgment,              
          petitioners ask the Court to:  (1) Find that the proper                     
          characterization of their distributive share of partnership                 
          losses is neither an affected item nor a partnership item for               





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011