Ellen M. Rangos - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         

          section 6651(a) addition to tax and section 6662(a) accuracy-               
          related penalties determined in the notices of deficiency.                  
                                       OPINION                                        
               The sole issue to be resolved concerns the characterization            
          (alimony or property settlement) of the payments  made  by                  
          petitioner's former husband for the purpose of providing petitioner         
          with an automobile in 1991 and 1994.  Petitioner asserts that these         
          payments are not alimony and her use of an automobile was provided          
          for pursuant to a property agreement.  On the other hand,                   
          respondent contends that the payments constituted alimony to                
          petitioner because they were: (1) Made "periodically" (i.e., every          
          3 years) under a written separation agreement, (2) constructively           
          received by petitioner, and (3) made to support and maintain                
          petitioner.                                                                 
               Succinctly stated, alimony or separate maintenance payments            
          are generally taxable to the recipient and deductible by the payor,         
          whereas transfer of property between spouses (property settlements)         
          incident to a divorce are generally not taxable events and do not           
          give rise to recognizable income or to a deduction.  Secs.                  
          61(a)(8), 712, 215(a).                                                      




               2    The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369, sec.           
          422, 98 Stat. 494, 795, extensively changed the alimony rules               
          effective for divorce decrees executed after Dec. 31, 1984.  We             
          note that this case involves sec. 71(a)(1) prior to its revision.           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011