Reed Smith Shaw & MClay, William J. Smith, Tax Matters Partner - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
             partnership's return for the 1986 taxable year was due on                
             or before April 15, 1987.  See sec. 1.6031-1(e)(2), Income               
             Tax Regs.  The return was filed at that time with no                     
             extensions.  Accordingly, in this case the tax matters                   
             partner must demonstrate that the partnership paid the                   
             2,000 shares of Saztec stock to the trust on or before                   
             April 15, 1987.                                                          
                  For purposes of section 404(a)(1) and (6), the terms                
             "paid" and "payment" mean that all taxpayers, regardless of              
             their method of accounting, must pay cash or its equivalent              
             within the statutory deadline in order to qualify for the                
             section 404(a) deduction.  See Don E. Williams Co. v.                    
             Commissioner, 429 U.S. 569, 579 (1977).  In the Don E.                   
             Williams Co. case, the Court explained:                                  

                  The statutory items "paid" and "payment," coupled                   
                  with the grace period and the legislative                           
                  history's reference to "paid" and "actually                         
                  paid," demonstrate that, regardless of the method                   
                  of accounting, all taxpayers must pay out cash or                   
                  its equivalent by the end of the grace period in                    
                  order to qualify for the � 404(a) deduction.                        
                       This accords, also, with the apparent policy                   
                  behind the statutory provision, namely, that an                     
                  objective outlay-of-assets test would insure the                    
                  integrity of the employees' plan and insure the                     
                  full advantage of any contribution which entitles                   
                  the employer to a tax benefit.  [Id. at 578-579.]                   









Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011