RJR Nabisco Inc. (Formerly R.J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.) and Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         


               Other than their respective requests for interest, neither             
          party asked the tribunal to award it any compensation for the               
          delayed payment of its claimed damages.  Neither party asked the            
          tribunal to make a separate award based upon “inflation”.                   
                    6.  Final Award                                                   
               The arbitration agreement provided for a “final award” (the            
          award).  The tribunal issued a document constituting the award on           
          March 24, 1982.  The award consists of eight sections and is 139            
          pages in length.  The eighth section is entitled “OPERATIVE                 
          SECTION (DISPOSITIF)” (operative section), and provides as                  
          follow:                                                                     
               For these reasons,                                                     
               THE TRIBUNAL, unanimously, having regard to all of the                 
               above mentioned considerations,                                        
               AWARDS to Aminoil,                                                     
               THE SUM OF ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY NINE MILLION, SEVEN                 
               HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED AND SIXTY                    
               FOUR UNITED STATES DOLLARS ($179,750,764) calculated on                
               the basis of being payable on 1 July, 1982.                            
               Kuwait honored the amount of the award and paid $179,750,764           
          to Aminoil on July 1, 1982 (the $179 million payment).                      
               The body of the award preceding the operative section sets             
          forth the reasoning of the tribunal.  The first section reviews             
          the procedural setting of the arbitration and summarizes the                
          claims of the parties.  The second section sets forth the facts             
          of the case.  The third section determines the applicable law,              




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011