Neal A. Sanders, d.b.a. Law Offices of Neal A. Sanders - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          Alan and Linda Sanders, as set forth in the third deficiency                
          notice, as well as the deficiencies set forth in the first and              
          second deficiency notices.  The amended petition states in                  
          pertinent part:                                                             
                         The deficiencies (or liabilities) as                         
                         determined by the Commissioners [sic] are                    
                         in excise taxes and penalties in an                          
                         accumulated amount in excess of                              
                         $10,000.00 and are all in dispute by the                     
                         Petitioners as set forth herein for years                    
                         1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995.  This                      
                         includes Form 1040, 1992, Form 1040, 1993                    
                         and Sections 4975 and 4971.                                  
                                                                                     
               On July 31, 1997, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for             
          lack of jurisdiction with respect to that part of the amended               
          petition relating to Neal Alan and Linda Sanders' 1992 and 1993             
          income tax deficiencies.  Respondent asserts that because the               
          January 2, 1997, petition contained no reference to respondent's            
          income tax determinations, petitioner is attempting, through the            
          filing of the amended petition, to seek a judicial redetermination          
          of a matter that could not come within the Court's jurisdiction             
          because of the expiration of time for filing a petition.  See Rule          
          41(a).  Accordingly, respondent contends that the amended petition          
          should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction insofar as it attempts         
          to confer jurisdiction on the Court over Neal Alan and Linda                
          Sanders' 1992 and 1993 income taxes.                                        
               On August 22, 1997, petitioner filed an objection to                   
          respondent's motion to dismiss; on October 2, 1997, petitioner              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011