Johannes M. Schalekamp - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         

          C.  Disposition of the Holland Spring Notes                                 
               In 1989, petitioner sold the Holland Spring notes to                   
          Herland.  At the time of that sale, petitioner’s adjusted basis             
          in the notes was $2,724,451.  Petitioner’s unreported installment           
          gain on the notes was $3,189,049, which leads us to believe that,           
          as of the time of sale, the total unpaid principal amount of the            
          Holland Spring notes was $5,913,500.  Petitioner testified that             
          he sold the Holland Spring notes to Herland for approximately               
          $2.5 million.  He further testified that he did so because he had           
          never been paid any of the interest or principal due on any of              
          the Holland Spring notes and he needed cash.  Petitioner was                
          credible, and respondent has introduced no evidence to impeach              
          petitioner’s testimony.  We find that petitioner received                   
          approximately $2.5 million on the sale of the Holland Spring                
          notes to Herland.  Given petitioner’s adjusted basis in the notes           
          of $2,724,451, we find that petitioner did not realize a gain on            
          the disposition of the Holland Spring notes.                                
               D.  Conclusion                                                         
               Petitioner realized no gain on the disposition of either the           
          1987 Ampel notes or the Holland Spring notes.  Accordingly,                 
          petitioner omitted no gross income from the 1989 return.                    
          IV. Conclusion                                                              
               Petitioner has not omitted gross income in excess of                   
          25 percent of the gross income stated on the 1989 return.                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011