Ronny H. and Charlotte A. Schmalzer - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          the extent the contribution is considered an “investment in the             
          contract”.  Secs. 408(d)(2), 72.  Thus, a distribution of IRA               
          contributions that were made before 1987, as well as the earnings           
          thereon, are fully includable in the taxpayer’s gross income upon           
          distribution.  Further, a distribution of IRA contributions that            
          are made after 1986 may or may not be includable in the                     
          taxpayer’s gross income depending upon whether the contributions            
          are considered an investment in a contract.                                 
               Under these rules, petitioner is not entitled to any basis             
          in his contributions made for 1985 and 1986.  The record does not           
          reflect whether petitioner made any contributions in 1987 or                
          whether petitioners claimed a deduction on their return for                 
          contributions made in 1987.  In 1988, petitioner made a                     
          contribution of $300 based upon the fact that petitioners claimed           
          a $300 deduction on their 1988 return.  Petitioner is not                   
          entitled to a basis in that contribution.                                   
               In the years 1989 and 1990, petitioner deposited $1,350 in             
          the IRA account, and petitioners did not claim any deduction                
          therefor on their 1989 or 1990 Federal income tax return.                   
          Accordingly for these contributions, petitioner has a basis of              
          $1,350.  In 1991 petitioner withdrew $1,400 and, within 60 days             
          thereafter, deposited $2,000 to the IRA account.  Accordingly,              
          the $1,400 withdrawn and redeposited does not constitute a                  
          deposit, as it is a timely rollover of a previous withdrawal.               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011