Gordon J. and Bonnie L. Schoof - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          Inc.", or some variation of that name.  None of the investors made          
          their checks payable to the FAC IRA or Mr. Thomson as trustee.  All         
          petitioners, other than Joe O. and Daurine M. Baker, contributed to         
          the FAC IRA by writing checks drawn on their personal checking              
          accounts.  Petitioners Joe O. and Daurine M. Baker caused the               
          trustee of their existing IRA's to issue cashier's checks.                  
               After investing in the FAC IRA, all petitioners executed               
          purchase, lease, maintenance, and buyback agreements with MDA and           
          executed an IRA adoption agreement with FAC.  Mr. Thomson executed          
          a Form 56 with respect to each petitioner.  Mr. Thomson and each            
          petitioner executed a Form 5305-A.                                          
               The rents generated by the bus stop shelter units were                 
          deposited into the El Dorado Bank custodial accounts.  The bus stop         
          shelter units were held in the FAC IRA trust.                               
               None of petitioners reported the distributions from their              
          IRA's (and in the case of Nurit Haramgaal, she did not report the           
          distribution from her IRA and pension plan) as a taxable event on           
          their 1991 Federal income tax returns.                                      
               In the respective notices of deficiency to petitioners,                
          respondent determined that the IRA and pension plan distributions           
          were taxable events on the predicate that petitioners did not               
          properly roll over the distributions into qualified IRA's.                  
          Respondent also determined that each petitioner was liable for a            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011