James T. Sinyard and Monique T. Sinyard - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          attorney's fees did not constitute income to the taxpayer.                  
          Cotnam v. Commissioner, 263 F.2d at 125, citing 46 Ala. Code sec.           
          64 (1940).                                                                  
               In Davis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-248, we followed             
          the Court of Appeals opinion in Cotnam but only because the same            
          Alabama law and the same appellate venue were involved as in                
          Cotnam.  See Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970), affd.              
          445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971); see also In re Hamilton, 212                 
          Bankr. 384 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 1997), applying Alabama law and                
          following Cotnam.                                                           
               Respondent disagrees with the Court of Appeals for the Fifth           
          Circuit, and respondent continues to assert that, as we held in             
          Cotnam, notwithstanding the peculiarities of State law, under               
          contingency fee agreements attorneys do not acquire ownership of            
          those portions of funds recovered in lawsuits allocable to                  
          attorney's fees, and the attorneys’ clients are taxable on the              
          full amount of the funds recovered in spite of any lien the                 
          attorneys may have thereon.                                                 
               In this case, petitioner resided in Arizona when he filed              
          his petition herein.  The parties, however, have not cited any              
          provision of Arizona statutory law, and we have found none, that            
          pertains to the legal rights of Arizona attorneys in monetary               
          awards recovered on behalf of their clients.                                
               Decisions by Arizona courts have addressed this issue only             
          to a limited extent.  In Skarecky & Horenstein, P.A. v. 3605 N.             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011