Kenneth and Sheila Smith - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          by petitioner total approximately $17,500.  Petitioner contends             
          that he is entitled to deductions for these expenses because they           
          constitute business expenses paid by him during 1994.                       
               To the extent that the disputed expenses are personal in               
          nature, they are not deductible pursuant to section 262.  To the            
          extent that the disputed expenses are Tracstar's business                   
          expenses, they are not deductible by petitioner because he has              
          failed to establish that his unreimbursed payment of Tracstar's             
          business expenses qualifies as an ordinary and necessary expense            
          of his own business under section 162(a).  Deputy v. du Pont, 308           
          U.S. 488 (1940); Kaplan v. Commissioner, 21 T.C. 134, 146 (1953).           
               The litigation over the nature of the expenses will                    
          ultimately determine who is liable for the disputed charges.  If            
          any of the expenses are found to be business in nature,                     
          petitioner is likely to be reimbursed by Tracstar to the extent             
          he paid for them with his bonus payments.  We hold that                     
          petitioner is not entitled to deductions for the disputed                   
          expenses.                                                                   
          Motor Home Interest and Depreciation                                        
               In 1990, petitioners purchased a 1989 Southwind motor home.            
          On or about November 1, 1994, petitioners replaced the 1989                 
          Southwind motor home with a 1994 Dynasty motor home.  On their              
          1994 return, petitioners claimed deductions for interest and                
          depreciation for both of the motor homes.  Petitioners did not              
          maintain a log of the business use of the motor homes.  In their            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011