Tadeusz Smus - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          1993              37,731               9,433              1,584             
          1994               2,456                 473                 93             
          1995               9,596               1,895                401             
          All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect           
          for the years in issue.  When Mr. Smus filed his petition, on               
          September 29, 1997, he resided in Rockford, Michigan.  Mr. Smus             
          did not file Federal income tax returns relating to the years in            
          issue.                                                                      
               Respondent contends that Mr. Smus received and failed to               
          report self-employment income relating to 1991, 1992, and 1993.             
          In the notice of deficiency issued to Mr. Smus, respondent                  
          informed Mr. Smus that "In the absence of adequate records, your            
          gross receipts for the taxable years ended December 31, 1991,               
          1992 and 1993 have been computed by reference to bank deposits."            
          The notice delineates that respondent further determined that Mr.           
          Smus failed to report, in 1993, 1994, and 1995, installment sale            
          gain and interest income, and, in 1994 and 1995, wages from                 
          AutoDie International.  Mr. Smus contends that respondent's                 
          determinations are arbitrary.                                               
               Where the issue in dispute is the taxpayer's receipt of                
          income, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, where an                
          appeal would lie, has recognized:                                           
               It is a sound principle that "[a] deficiency                           
               determination which is not supported by the proper                     
               foundation of substantive evidence is clearly arbitrary                
               and erroneous," and that the Commissioner "cannot rely                 
               on the presumption [of correctness] in the absence of a                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011