- 4 - from Northbrook Life Insurance Co., a completed Schedule K, and other documents showing distributions or payments to petitioners. On April 19, 1995, petitioners sent to respondent a document entitled "joint income tax return, 1994". This document was not a Form 1040 but was a document generated by petitioners. This document did contain specific dollar amounts in various places, including an attached Schedule A, Form 2106, Forms 1099, Schedule K, documents from Dean Witter, and Forms W-2. The document created by petitioners differed in significant respects from the Commissioner's Form 1040, including the form of the jurat. Respondent used transcripts of petitioners' information returns from 1992 through 1994 to compute the deficiencies determined in the notices of deficiency. After the notices were issued, petitioners produced their books and records to respondent and respondent made a number of concessions. In papers filed with respondent and with the Court, petitioners argue that Federal income taxes violate various amendments of the U.S. Constitution and that so-called Fifth Amendment returns are valid. In oral argument, petitioners also asserted that section 61(a) is incompatible with the 16th Amendment of the Constitution. OPINION Petitioners do not contest that they received the wages, interest, and other amounts determined by respondent in the notices of deficiency. They argue instead that these amounts arePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011