Maurice H. Sochia and Beatrice M. Sochia - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         

          from Northbrook Life Insurance Co., a completed Schedule K, and             
          other documents showing distributions or payments to petitioners.           
               On April 19, 1995, petitioners sent to respondent a document           
          entitled "joint income tax return, 1994".  This document was not            
          a Form 1040 but was a document generated by petitioners.  This              
          document did contain specific dollar amounts in various places,             
          including an attached Schedule A, Form 2106, Forms 1099, Schedule           
          K, documents from Dean Witter, and Forms W-2.  The document                 
          created by petitioners differed in significant respects from the            
          Commissioner's Form 1040, including the form of the jurat.                  
               Respondent used transcripts of petitioners' information                
          returns from 1992 through 1994 to compute the deficiencies                  
          determined in the notices of deficiency.  After the notices were            
          issued, petitioners produced their books and records to                     
          respondent and respondent made a number of concessions.                     
               In papers filed with respondent and with the Court,                    
          petitioners argue that Federal income taxes violate various                 
          amendments of the U.S. Constitution and that so-called Fifth                
          Amendment returns are valid.  In oral argument, petitioners also            
          asserted that section 61(a) is incompatible with the 16th                   
          Amendment of the Constitution.                                              
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioners do not contest that they received the wages,               
          interest, and other amounts determined by respondent in the                 
          notices of deficiency.  They argue instead that these amounts are           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011