Estate of Honore V. De St. Aubin, Deceased, Ovide E. De St. Aubin, Executor, et al. - Page 26

                                       - 26 -                                         

                  Before applying EPTL section 11-2.1(k), we must decide              
             whether the 1987 provision or the 1965 provision applies.                
             In passing the 1987 amendments, the New York State                       
             legislature provided the following instruction:                          

                  This act shall take effect immediately [July 30,                    
                  1987] and shall apply to proceeds received during                   
                  any period as to which the fiduciary's account                      
                  has not been settled prior to such effective                        
                  date, whether the proceeds were received prior to                   
                  or after such effective date by any trust * * *                     
                  established before, on or after the effective                       
                  date hereof.  [1987 N.Y. Laws ch. 495, sec. 2.]                     

                  As of the date of these motions, Mr. de St. Aubin's                 
             executors' accounts had not been settled.  Therefore, the                
             1987 provision is controlling, although the amendment to                 
             the statute was made more than 20 years after the execution              
             of Mr. de St. Aubin's will.  See In re Allister, 545                     
             N.Y.S.2d 483 (Sur. Ct. 1989) (applying EPTL section                      
             11-2.1(k), as amended in 1987, in a proceeding in which                  
             the decedent died in 1969 and her beneficiary died in                    
             1985).                                                                   
                  Respondent argues that this Court should supplant the               
             effective date supplied by the legislature because of the                
             actions of Mr. de St. Aubin's executors, and, therefore,                 
             the 1965 provision should apply.  In this regard,                        
             respondent has made numerous allegations regarding the                   
             propriety of the actions of the executors.  Respondent                   




Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011