2 Neither party requested a hearing, and we conclude that none is necessary to decide petitioners' motion. Petitioners' motion for summary judgment raises the following issues: 1. Whether the sharing of tax return information between respondent and the State of Montana violated section 6103(d) or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. sec. 552a (1994). We hold that it did not. 2. Whether the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners is invalid because respondent either (a) did not make notice and demand for tax under section 6303, or (b) did not sign it in pen and ink. We hold that these circumstances do not invalidate the notice of deficiency. References to Mr. Stone are to petitioner Jeffrey Stone. References to Mrs. Stone are to petitioner Kelly Stone. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Background A. Petitioners Petitioners are married and lived in Belgrade, Montana, when they filed their petition.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011