Estate of Jacqueline A. Stotz, Deceased, Trent McGee and Leo Kaplan, Co-Executors and Jackie Stotz Trust, Trent McGee and Leo Kaplan, Co-Trustees - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

          not bear out petitioners’ allegation.  Based on the notice of               
          deficiency and respondent’s trial memorandum, it is clear that              
          respondent’s trial position was essentially the same as the one             
          expressed in Estate of Davis v. Commissioner, supra.  Even though           
          respondent’s litigation position in Estate of Davis did not come            
          to petitioners’ attention until after a basis for settlement had            
          been reached, petitioners were aware of respondent’s trial                  
          memorandum at the time of settlement.  Accordingly, to the extent           
          that there was a mistake of fact or misunderstanding about                  
          respondent’s trial position in this case, it would have been                
          petitioners’ unilateral mistake or misunderstanding.  It is also            
          noted that there was no mistake about the terms of the settlement           
          between the parties or the underlying facts.  The alleged mistake           
          is about the Government’s litigating position.                              
               Petitioners, relying on Stamm Intl. Corp. v. Commissioner,             
          90 T.C. 315, 320-321 (1988), contend that respondent’s counsel              
          made an affirmative misrepresentation as to respondent’s                    
          litigating position.  Petitioners contend that they relied on the           
          misrepresentation and that grounds exist for relief from the                
          settlement stipulation.  See also Saigh v. Commissioner, 26 T.C.            
          171, 180 (1956), where the Court recognized that “Excusable                 
          damaging reliance upon a false or untrue representation of the              
          other party, even one innocently made, is a recognized ground for           
          relief from a settlement stipulation.”                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011