Eddie Stricklin - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          In 1990, petitioner was employed by and received W-2 income from            
          Dana Transport totaling $753.  In addition to the W-2 income                
          received during 1989 and 1990, petitioner worked for and received           
          income from Lighthouse Transport (Lighthouse) during both years.            
          Petitioner had no other source of income during these years.                
               During the years in issue, petitioner resided in Chicago,              
          Illinois, with his aunt to whom he paid rent in the amount of               
          approximately $200 per month.  Petitioner gave money to his 17-             
          year-old daughter who was not living with him and also paid his             
          own living expenses, which included the cost of food, clothing,             
          recreation, gasoline, and car insurance.  In addition, petitioner           
          paid lodging expenses for stays in motels between six and eight             
          times a month.  Petitioner had no checking or savings accounts              
          during the years in issue.                                                  
               In 1991, petitioner was employed by Dana Transport from                
          which he received somewhere between $30,000 and $40,000 in W-2              
          income during the taxable year.                                             
               On February 6, 1992, petitioner was involved in a traffic              
          accident resulting in a fire in his truck in which all of his               
          then-existing records were destroyed.                                       
               Respondent mailed a notice of deficiency to petitioner with            
          respect to 1989 and 1990 on June 28, 1995.  Because petitioner              
          did not file income tax returns for these years, the notice of              
          deficiency was based upon substitute returns prepared by                    
          respondent.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011