- 10 - For their participation in the transaction, in the Wentz case, 105 T.C. at 11-12, we stated: "[The taxpayers] were compensated with the annual benefits of whole life insurance policies, thus triggering a taxable event." Relying in part on Woodbury, we found that the "undeniable accession to wealth, clearly realized", Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955), that the Wentzes enjoyed equaled the amount of first-year premium. Unlike petitioners, however, the taxpayers in Wentz and Woodbury did not execute notes in connection with the transactions under consideration in those cases. In this case petitioners concede on brief that if income has been realized as a result of the transactions here under consideration, the proper measure of the income equals the first- year premium paid in connection with each policy. Petitioners argue, however, that the transactions did not result in the realization of income because they "paid" for the insurance with nonrecourse notes. According to petitioners, the notes, which they contend represent bona fide indebtedness, distinguish their case from Wentz v. Commissioner, supra, and Woodbury v. United States, supra. Respondent argues that the notes do not represent bona fide indebtedness and should therefore be ignored. Respondent finds support for his argument in Haderlie v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-525. Like petitioners, the Haderlies were clients of the Schwabs and were induced by them toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011