Don and Margaret Taylor - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          importance" or "principally".  See Malat v. Riddell, 383 U.S.               
          569, 572 (1966); Fox v. Commissioner, supra; Surloff v.                     
          Commissioner, 81 T.C. 210, 233 (1983).  Although profit need not            
          be the sole motive, if the taxpayer's intent to make a profit is            
          merely incidental, the taxpayer will not be entitled to the loss            
          under section 165(c)(2).  Cotner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          1996-428.                                                                   
               Consequently, if the taxpayer's overriding purpose for                 
          purchasing the real estate is personal, the requisite profit                
          motive cannot be established.  See O'Neill v. Commissioner,  T.C.           
          Memo. 1985-92; Nicath Realty Co. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          1966-246.  Also, if the taxpayer purchases property with the                
          expectation of making a profit on the sale after it has served              
          the personal purposes for which it was initially purchased, then            
          profit motive is not the primary motive.  Meyer v. Commissioner,            
          34 T.C. 528 (1960).                                                         
               We now analyze whether petitioners possessed the requisite             
          profit motive to claim a loss under section 165(c)(2).  We first            
          consider the relevant factors outlined under section 1.183-2(b),            
          Income Tax Regs.                                                            
               Our first inquiry is whether petitioners purchased the Palm            
          Springs House in a businesslike manner.  We find that                       
          petitioners' behavior in purchasing the Palm Springs House was              
          not businesslike.  Petitioners were not aware of the Palm Springs           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011