Joseph F. and Camille T. Uddo - Page 2

                                                                                - 2 -- 2 -                                                                                 
                    hearing, and the Court concludes that a hearing is not necessary                                                                                       
                    for the proper disposition of this motion.                                                                                                             
                              On their jointly filed 1994 Federal income tax return,                                                                                       
                    petitioners reported $57,285 as a taxable distribution from an                                                                                         
                    individual retirement account (IRA).  For petitioners' 1994 tax                                                                                        
                    year respondent received a Form 1099-R from American Express                                                                                           
                    Trust Co. (American Express) reporting that petitioners had                                                                                            
                    received a gross distribution of $156,931.                                                                                                             
                              On January 6, 1997, respondent mailed a 30-day letter (Tax                                                                                   
                    Notice CP-2000) to petitioners.  A copy of the letter was sent to                                                                                      
                    William A. Neilson (Mr. Neilson) as attorney for petitioners.                                                                                          
                    The letter stated that respondent proposed to increase                                                                                                 
                    petitioners' taxable income by $165,211.  The proposed increase                                                                                        
                    produced an additional tax liability of $57,671.  In addition,                                                                                         
                    the letter proposed an accuracy-related penalty of $11,534.  The                                                                                       
                    letter stated that if petitioners did not respond within 30 days                                                                                       
                    respondent would issue a notice of deficiency.  The letter                                                                                             
                    further stated that if petitioners did not agree with                                                                                                  
                    respondent's proposed changes, petitioners should submit a signed                                                                                      
                    statement of explanation and include any supporting                                                                                                    
                    documentation.  Petitioners did not respond to the 30-day letter.                                                                                      
                              On May 9, 1997, respondent mailed the notice of deficiency                                                                                   
                    determining a deficiency in petitioners' 1994 Federal income tax                                                                                       
                    in the amount of $57,671 and an accuracy-related penalty under                                                                                         
                    section 6662(a) and (d) in the amount of $11,534.  Petitioners                                                                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011