Venture Funding, Ltd. - Page 48

                                       - 48 -                                         
               Section 1.83-6(a)(2), Income Tax Regs., provides a "Special            
          rule" for compensatory transfers of property by "employers" to              
          "employees".  It allows a deduction in the employer's taxable               
          year that coincides with the year in which the compensation is              
          "includible" in the employee's income, but "only if the employer            
          deducts and withholds upon such amount in accordance with section           
          3402."  Id.  This regulatory requirement that there be                      
          withholding has no basis in the statutory language or the                   
          legislative history of section 83(h).  The majority nevertheless            
          upholds the validity of this withholding requirement by treating            
          it as a relaxation of what it believes to be the more explicit              
          and onerous requirements in the Code.  The only basis for this is           
          the majority's restrictive and erroneous interpretation of the              
          word "included".9                                                           

               9The withholding requirement in sec. 1.83-6(a)(2), Income              
          Tax Regs., is fatally flawed even if one were to accept                     
          respondent's definition of "included".  Under this regulation,              
          deductibility is totally dependent on whether the employer                  
          withheld tax upon the compensatory transfer of property.  An                
          obvious example in which the withholding requirement is                     
          unworkable involves its application to situations where there are           
          significant restrictions on the employee's rights to the property           
          at the time of transfer such as a substantial risk of forfeiture.           
          In that case, the employee generally receives no includible gross           
          income under sec. 83(a) until those restrictions are lifted.                
          Therefore, there would be no withholding requirement at the time            
          of the initial transfer.  Indeed, the amount of any reportable              
          compensation would not be known at the time of transfer.  But any           
          withholding that might be required when the restrictions are                
          lifted, possibly years later, may be physically or legally                  
          impossible if the employee earned no other compensation in the              
          later year or was no longer an employee.  Withholding would also            
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011