Chen C. and Victoria R. Wang, et al. - Page 43

                                       - 43 -                                         

          United States v. Boyle, supra at 251 ("Most taxpayers are not               
          competent to discern error in the substantive advice of an                  
          accountant or attorney").  Accordingly, we do not sustain                   
          respondent's imposition of the accuracy-related penalties on the            
          portions of the deficiencies relating to the change in accounting           
          method.                                                                     
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decisions will be entered           
                                             under Rule 155.                          





























Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  

Last modified: May 25, 2011