Stephen S. Wang, Jr. - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          Mr. Lee deposited an additional $50,000 into the bank account in            
          February 1988.  In 1987, petitioner also sold insider information           
          to Mr. Jerome Cronin, a former University of Illinois classmate,            
          in exchange for $4,000.                                                     
               On June 27, 1988, the Securities and Exchange Commission               
          (SEC) instituted a civil action against petitioner and Mr. Lee in           
          the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for           
          alleged violations of sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities            
          Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. secs. 78j(b) and 78n(e), and SEC            
          Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3, 17 C.F.R. secs. 240.10b-5 and 240.14e-3,             
          promulgated thereunder.  SEC v. Wang, 88 Civ. No. 4461 (RO)                 
          (S.D.N.Y.).  The civil complaint contained allegations that Mr.             
          Lee purchased insider information from petitioner about 25                  
          companies and used that information to purchase securities.  The            
          SEC sought preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting                
          petitioner and Mr. Lee from participating in alleged securities             
          law violations and from disposing of their assets.  The SEC also            
          sought to have petitioner and Mr. Lee disgorge their profits                
          derived from the insider information petitioner had sold to Mr.             
          Lee.  Petitioner entered into a settlement of the civil action              
          with the SEC and agreed to disgorge $125,000, the amount                    
          remaining in the nominee bank account.  In 1988, the disgorgement           
          was placed in a receivership fund to be used as restitution for             
          investors who could show a loss due to petitioner’s and Mr. Lee’s           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011