- 2 - Petitioner sold seeds, fertilizer, and other supplies to farmers during the years in issue. Petitioner's owner provided advice and some financial assistance to petitioner's customers. The issue for decision is whether respondent committed an abuse of discretion in determining that petitioner must use the accrual method of accounting during the years in issue. To decide this, we must decide: 1. Whether petitioner's purchase and sale of merchandise was a material income-producing factor in 1990 and 1992. We hold that it was. 2. Whether petitioner qualifies as a farmer for purposes of using the cash method of accounting for 1990 and 1992. We hold that it does not. 3. Whether respondent's determination was an abuse of discretion because, in determining that petitioner's use of the cash method did not clearly reflect income, respondent compared only 3 years of petitioner's income under the cash and accrual methods of accounting. We hold that respondent need not have considered more than the 3 years in issue. Thus, we hold that petitioner must use inventories and the accrual method of accounting for 1990 and 1992. 1(...continued) method of accounting for 1990, 1991, and 1992 and that petitioner had a deficiency in income tax for 1990 and 1992. Respondent determined that petitioner overpaid tax for 1991.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011