- 3 - related tax deficiency", the case would be remanded to this Court to "determine what portion, if any, of the deficiency is subject to innocent spouse relief." Wiksell v. Commissioner, supra at 1464. By Order dated April 15, 1997, we granted petitioner's Motion to Change Caption. The amended caption of this case reflects the fact that Margaret's name was legally changed after her divorce from David. A further trial was held in the remanded matter. The sole issue for decision is whether petitioner qualifies for innocent spouse relief pursuant to section 6013(e) with respect to any portion of the deficiencies asserted in respondent's amended answer for taxable years 1984 and 1985. Petitioner resided in Newhall, California, when the petition was filed. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. We adopt in full the findings of fact in our prior memorandum opinion. For convenience, we shall repeat the facts as necessary to clarify the ensuing discussion, and we make additional findings of fact. David and Margaret were married in 1960, legally separated in 1988, and divorced in December, 1992. They had threePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011