- 8 - length transaction with an unrelated party. See Southeastern Canteen Co. v. Commissioner, 410 F.2d 615, 619 (6th Cir. 1969), affg. in part and revg. in part T.C. Memo. 1967-183; Place v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 199, 203 (1951), affd. per curiam 199 F.2d 373 (6th Cir. 1952); see also Maschmeyer's Nursery, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-78. The close relationship in the present case is evident. Dr. Wysong was the sole shareholder of both corporations, and whatever negotiations took place were between Dr. Wysong and himself. Furthermore, Dr. Wysong signed the lease agreements on behalf of both the lessor and the lessee. The entire record supports the fact that there were no arm's-length negotiations between the two entities. We closely scrutinize related party transactions, and to the extent that rent paid by a lessee to a related lessor is excessive, a rental deduction will be disallowed. The question of whether rental payments are reasonable is one of fact. Many factors may be considered, such as the terms and conditions of the lease and the facts and circumstances surrounding the signing of the lease. See Audano v. United States, 428 F.2d 251, 256 (5th Cir. 1970); Commissioner v. Lincoln Elec. Co., 176 F.2d 815, 817 (6th Cir. 1949); see also Alondra Indus., Ltd. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-32. No one factor is dispositive. Petitioners argue that the claimed rent was reasonable because the parties to the lease agreements intended to conveyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011