- 5 - law creates legal interests, but Federal law determines when and how they are taxed. Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103, 110 (1932); Brown v. United States, 890 F.2d 1329, 1337 n.9 (5th Cir. 1989). Although the assignment of the right to receive income may be the transfer of a property right under State law, it may also be an anticipatory assignment of income under Federal income tax law. C.M. Thibodaux Co. v. United States, 915 F.2d 992, 996 (5th Cir. 1990). In order to support his argument, petitioner relies on the dissent in Helvering v. Eubank, 311 U.S. 122 (1940). The Eubank majority, however, held that the assignment of renewal contracts for insurance commissions was an assignment of income rather than an assignment of property, id. at 125, and that the commissions were taxable to the assignor. Id. at 124. We hold that the $113,081 in renewal commissions is taxable to petitioner. Substantial Understatement Penalty Section 6662(a) imposes an accuracy-related penalty of 20 percent on any portion of an underpayment of tax that is attributable to items set forth in section 6662(b)(2). Section 6662(b) specifies as one of those items "Any substantial understatement of income tax." An "understatement" is the amount by which the tax required to be shown on the return for the taxable year exceeds the taxPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011