- 5 - in the promotional accounts are not the income or property of petitioner. We agree with respondent. Petitioner's analysis recognizes that the funds in the promotional accounts expended for advertising are not taxable to petitioner; however, it fails to take into account that the food show rebates are. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recognized that some of the food show rebates came from the promotional accounts when it stated "Vendors * * * use the funds in their promotional accounts as a means of supplying Vendor representatives with the necessary rebate cash." See Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner, 154 F.3d at 529. Accordingly, the funds withdrawn from the promotional accounts and distributed at the food shows are taxable to petitioner. In addition, petitioner received $60,000 and $100,000 from Western Family Foods, Inc., for distribution at the food shows in 1989 and 1990, respectively. At trial, petitioner acknowledged that these funds constituted income to petitioner at the time of receipt. Petitioner was able to substantiate that $35,616 and $82,958 of these funds were distributed to member stores at the food shows in 1989 and 1990, respectively. Thus, we held that petitioner was entitled to deductions in these amounts. In the original Rule 155 computation, petitioner's income was increased by the difference between the amount of the funds given toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011