Affiliated Foods, Inc., A Corporation - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         

          in the promotional accounts are not the income or property of               
          petitioner.                                                                 
               We agree with respondent.  Petitioner's analysis recognizes            
          that the funds in the promotional accounts expended for                     
          advertising are not taxable to petitioner; however, it fails to             
          take into account that the food show rebates are.  The Court of             
          Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recognized that some of the food              
          show rebates came from the promotional accounts when it stated              
          "Vendors * * * use the funds in their promotional accounts as a             
          means of supplying Vendor representatives with the necessary                
          rebate cash."  See Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner, 154              
          F.3d at 529.  Accordingly, the funds withdrawn from the                     
          promotional accounts and distributed at the food shows are                  
          taxable to petitioner.                                                      
               In addition, petitioner received $60,000 and $100,000 from             
          Western Family Foods, Inc., for distribution at the food shows in           
          1989 and 1990, respectively.  At trial, petitioner acknowledged             
          that these funds constituted income to petitioner at the time of            
          receipt.  Petitioner was able to substantiate that $35,616 and              
          $82,958 of these funds were distributed to member stores at the             
          food shows in 1989 and 1990, respectively.  Thus, we held that              
          petitioner was entitled to deductions in these amounts.  In the             
          original Rule 155 computation, petitioner's income was increased            
          by the difference between the amount of the funds given to                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011