Ferydoun Ahadpour, a.k.a F. Ahadpour and Doris Ahadpour - Page 6






                                        - 6 -                                         
          Steinman).  Also on May 2, 1990, petitioners deposited the                  
          $200,000 into an account at Wells Fargo Bank held in the name               
          “Huntington Harbour Bay and Racquet Club Marina Acct”.  The                 
          balance in this account immediately before the deposit was                  
          $35,214.02.  On the same day, petitioners wrote a check from this           
          account for $200,000 to purchase a certificate of deposit.4                 
               Petitioners did not report the $500,000 received in 1989 and           
          the $200,000 received in 1990 from Escrow Holder as income on               
          their 1989 or 1990 tax return or on any subsequent returns.                 
          Public Trust Land Problem                                                   
               In April 1990, local Huntington Beach residents sued CDC and           
          the City of Huntington Beach with respect to CDC’s planned                  
          condominium development at the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Phase            
          I.  The lawsuit challenged, inter alia, the legality of “land use           
          approvals” made by the City of Huntington Beach under the                   
          “General Plan” with respect to a zoning variance for Phase I of             
          the project.  The residents also contended that height                      
          restrictions were violated and that the project did not promote             
          the general welfare of the neighborhood.                                    
               In a letter dated May 11, 1990, the attorney representing              
          the residents wrote a letter to the deputy city attorney for                
          Huntington Beach and the executive director of the California               

          4  The record contains substantial additional evidence                      
          tracing petitioners’ use of the funds received from the Escrow              
          Holder.  We believe that material is irrelevant to the issue.               
          Suffice it to say that petitioners exercised dominion and control           
          over these funds without restriction.                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011