- 7 - the transaction as a loan; (7) any repayments have been made; and (8) the borrower was solvent at the time of the loan. See Hunt v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-335; see also Zimmerman v. United States, 318 F.2d 611, 613 (9th Cir. 1963); Estate of Maxwell v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 594, 604 (1992), affd. 3 F.3d 591 (2d Cir. 1993); Estate of Kelley v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 321, 323-324 (1974); Rude v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 165, 173 (1967); Clark v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 780, 783 (1952), affd. per curiam 205 F.2d 353 (2d Cir. 1953); Bragg v. Commissioner, supra. The factors are not exclusive, and no one factor controls. Rather, our evaluation of the various factors provides us with an evidentiary basis upon which we make our ultimate factual determination of whether a bona fide indebtedness existed. See Litton Bus. Sys., Inc. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 367, 377 (1973). With those factors in mind, we turn to the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction to determine whether a bona fide debtor-creditor relationship was created. 1. Promissory Note or Other Evidence of Indebtedness Petitioners introduced a promissory note to Jeffrey, signed by Stephen, for $100,000. Petitioners also introduced an agreement between petitioner and Jeffrey whereby petitioner purchased the note for $100,000. 2. Interest The note executed by Stephen to Jeffrey stated that interest would be paid at the rate of 13 percent per annum on the unpaid principal amount. At some time after petitioner acquired thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011