Milton R. Beall - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

               Respondent contends that refund of the sum of $2,097 is                
          barred by the statute of limitations effect of section 6512(b).             
          Petitioner argues that he is not seeking a refund but only credit           
          against his tax liability for 1994 and 1995.  The Court does not            
          have jurisdiction over either 1994 or 1995.  In any event, the              
          applicable authorities equate refund and credit and indicate that           
          either is barred in these circumstances.                                    
               Petitioner's overpayment resulted from a combination of                
          income taxes withheld during 1992 and estimated tax payments made           
          for 1992 and 1993.  Section 6513(b)(1) provides that tax deducted           
          and withheld is deemed paid on the 15th day of the fourth month             
          following the close of the taxable year for which the tax is                
          allowable as a credit.  Section 6513(b)(2) provides that any                
          amounts paid as estimated tax are deemed paid on the last day               
          prescribed for filing the return for the year for which the                 
          estimate is paid.  Thus, petitioner's entire overpayment carried            
          forward from 1992 to 1993 is deemed paid no later than April 15,            
          1994.                                                                       
               Petitioner did not file his 1993 return, or any claim for              
          refund, until August 1997, 4 months after the notice of                     
          deficiency was sent.  If a petition is filed in the Tax Court and           
          an overpayment is determined, no credit or refund may be allowed            
          unless the Court determines that the portion constituting the               
          overpayment was paid after the mailing of the notice of                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011