- 4 -
In a letter to Mr. Read dated July 12, 1996, from
respondent's Appeals Office, respondent informed Mr. Read that it
was thought that the case might be resolved by mail. The letter
further read:
I have a copy of the June 18, 1987 decree issued
by Judge Libbey. However, the administrative file did
not contain copies of the March 8, 1989 and/or December
22, 1989 modifications as described in your letter of
June 3, 1995. Please submit complete copies of these
orders as well as any subsequent to the 1989 order
(sic). Once I receive the orders, I will call you to
discuss my findings.
A letter dated August 6, 1996, from Mr. Read to respondent's
Appeals Office reads, in part:
Thank you for your letter of July 12, 1996. I am
pleased to learn that you believe this case can be
settled by mail. I would have responded sooner, but I
have been on vacation.
I enclose copies of the March 18, 1989 and
December 22, 1989 orders you requested. I know of no
other orders affecting support that were issued between
the December 22, 1989 order and the end of tax year
1993.
In a letter to Mr. Read dated August 13, 1996, respondent's
Appeals Office forwarded to Mr. Read a proposed stipulation-
decision document in which respondent conceded the case for the
year 1993.
In a letter pertaining to their 1994 tax year, respondent
forwarded to petitioners a report of examination which disallowed
the alimony deduction claimed on their 1994 joint Federal income
tax return. Respondent's disallowance of the 1994 claimed
alimony deduction mirrored respondent's 1993 disallowance of the
similarly claimed alimony deduction.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011